No. 20-5821
IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-sexual-assault due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance prosecutorial-misconduct sexual-assault
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant's 6th Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his trial counsel failed to present evidence of the element of sexual penetration required for the criminal sexual assault charge, resulting in a conviction that violated the defendant's 5th Amendment due process rights
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Calvin Simpson
Calvin Simpson — Petitioner