No. 20-5813
Glenn Young v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment jury-conviction jury-trial non-unanimous-verdict sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the State's evidence sufficient to sustain Young's non-unanimous conviction?
Was Young entitled to a unanimous jury verdict under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Was Young was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the State's evidence sufficient to sustain Young's nonunanimous conviction?
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Reply of petitioner Glenn Young filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-05
Brief of respondent Vannoy, Warden in opposition filed.
2020-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 5, 2021.
2020-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2021 to February 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2021.
2020-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2020 to January 6, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-06
Response Requested. (Due December 7, 2020)
2020-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2020-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Glenn Young
Glenn Young — Petitioner
Vannoy, Warden
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent