Whether the Court of Appeals and The District Court erred and Prejudiced me in denying and dismissing my claims and case (including injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 Criminal counterparts of 42 U.S. § 1983) as I sought in my § 1983 complaint claiming that my suit was filed outside the 2 years statute of limitation is in total conflict with this Honorable U.S. Supreme Court holding in the Case of Wallace-v-Kato, 549 U.S. 384 (2007) when the record is clear that my false arrest of Oct. 18, 2015 was due to an arrest first on a probation warrant that did not exist and 2nd on the fabricated Charge of Possession of a firearm I did not contend that my case based on Bibb County for the fabricated Criminal charge false arrest claim, NOV. 2018 prison on the probation revocation until and therefore any statute of limitations periods was equitably tolled due to the continuing wrong/Appellee all Caused by the Respondents Defendants.

Whether the 11th Cir and the District court decision to close my case for want of prosecution sully that Congress Enacted §§ 241 & 242 to be instructions allows Corrupt public Officials and entities to act with Subjective deliberate indifference to individuals U.S. Constitutional rights and protection, and Safety as claimed in any provision of §1983 also enacted by Congress.

Whether the 11th Cir and the District Court Dismissal of my case therefore for the U.S. courts to cause me to become overwhelmed with debt of owed filing fees of actions the Court.

And Finally, Whether the Court of Appeal's and discerns the Public, that both of these U.S. allows Public officials to in a Corrupt Courts under 42 U.S.C §1983, when the records of the District Court and Magistrates clearly shows that the Magistrate acknowledged that my U.S. constitutional rights to Probable Cause and excessive force were violated.

Whether the Court of Appeals and the District Court erred in dismissing the Petitioner's claims and case, including the Petitioner's request for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when the records show that the Respondents/Defendants deliberately violated the Petitioner's U.S. and State Constitutional protected rights