No. 20-5765

Daniel F. Borden, Sr. v. Gary Swarthout, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence probable-cause prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was a Candy Mealy to Police Officers, when The Are Excalpatoay Matecial Evid m exon eanke, A Persens? ial, Evidence That Wo a @ Caw the People Tusk Diregnad Favorable Evidence Showing Whe Aceused iS Pactaally Eenocent %

(3) hy The In vEprion For A WARDaANt, Foi Aeres\, Arb Then in Ceiminal, Reanignament must Vhaene BEA i onon O@DEL EW THEA ¢ Poolbable Cause DererminAWon © Ssermnctile.)

(@) Can a ehoto Copied Scaumed, ste Dated Signaectr aye, Se WAaAnt Declaration For Bequest SeNAia > Sy Someone Who Did Wor oloseQue WAL Committing okCumes

(6) Wiha is olay TO Rewenst> Any eacing Pot Fackual, Wmniocencey mat CAN Clearly Be Prevent Te' Case Fining WOOMA Gorrtne ovrcome ©& RK Connicrion e

1) Caw a Qolice oll iea@ uscd nancy wAceantt TO SEITE A\\ pur Reopesiiy ot Close Your Bank Resowts he Suk Down Your egneEnconess

Can A Reoscetro® TEN ors S LENT, EYTAINESSES who SRI We Dower ReepekrahoroF ACHME \Wour Nor NEEDED, Dow Cometo RouwkC

(4) Can the Passecutor Coa Senen Months Poe eeelt minsanay CARIN y When Accused Never Waived TNS, Ks

(10) Cans a Passeostoe Moog Exe Coininal Changes \estto ONT cinage with We rinbice DE Ad owal | Cinnaaes Yo uv Cnneged By Surpeise

( \) Can A Superior Couch Aude Oeper arr Wane yo Be ow Caled aw Se Be Weard) by Ruling, kN puokhat Audge Nok Monod hak Paling?

(\) Does he Rauik oP The Poisonous WEEe Standard SMM Dep ¢

(13) Does DePorse AMooes Failuceto hoeare EqeWiniesses BEA Ceime amountyo TAC. ¢

(\ 4) When a Cebitionce Mas Clean Moands Aw Comes BeloeaThe Cover, Can Keli? Be Given For A Aadgmes Raneured Sy Feaud ¢

(\5) When A werk Molds The Wevessata aedENEARCT Su sehen Oy ARRdAvits | Wilyrks ot ont Areeptne PidwaITe of acdsips BM re Teyushies Does Nosh cee Sti Der ANd, Nt erversti ons §

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether exculpatory material evidence that would exonerate a person is required to be disclosed by the prosecution

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent Gary Swarthout, Warden to respond filed.
2020-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Daniel F. Borden, Sr.
Daniel F. Borden — Petitioner
Gary Swarthout, Warden
Tami Michelle KrenzinOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent