Whether 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1951(a), aiding and abetting interference with commerce by robbery, falls under the residual clause found at 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B), in light of this Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319.

Whether the petitioner's convictions for aiding and abetting interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951(a) and 2, and aiding and abetting the use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A) and 2, are valid in light of this Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 134 S.Ct. 2334