No. 20-5734
Alfred Flores, III v. California
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment constitutional-requirements criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing death-penalty due-process jury-findings jury-trial reasonable-doubt ring-v-arizona sentencing
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether California's death penalty scheme violates the constitutional requirement that any fact that increases the penalty for a crime must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-california's-death-penalty-scheme-violates-the-constitutional-requirement-that-any-fact-that-increases-the-penalty-for-a-crime-must-be-found-by-a-jury-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-15
Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.
2020-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Alfred Flores
Robert H. Derham — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
State of California
Christine Yoon Friedman — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent