No. 20-5725
Rheashad Lamar Lott v. E. Oseguera, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-conviction due-process federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure post-conviction-relief standing state-supreme-court statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS PETITIONER'S 42 U.S.L. $ 1983 LOMPLAINT ENTITLED TO BENEFIT OFEQUITABLE TOLLING?
IN SOME EXTLA DRDINARY WAY FRDM ASSERTING HIS RIGHTS BEFDRE THE
SIATUTE OF LIMITATIONS EXPIRED?
A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH OTHED COUTS OF APPEALS OF THE UNITED
STATES ORZ UNITED STATES SUPRETE COURTS' DELISTOUS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was PeTL {tower's 42 U.S.C. 31493 COMPLATY ENTITLED To REVEFIT OF EQUITARE Tota
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Rheashad Lott
Rheashad Lamar Lott — Petitioner