5H, 6TH ANA 14TH AMENNMENI RICHIS TO DUE PROCESS.
WHCHED THE COUDIS A EXPDUSSL AN IN NUCT CONEUCT WNH CACHOTHC DECUSIONSAN CASL
LLAW HOLGING WHICH THE PEIMONEE AE NO BUINC AEOUEN THE SAMC RELEK AS THOSK SAME IENTICAL
SKTURTE DEKENDANTS HAVE BEEN ALODEN REUCK ON LAW AND PLS, AND THE SIR DECIS NOCTUNE
APPL TD PETMIONEE'S_CASE.

4.WHUTHED THE COUDTS EAHLEN TO ARPU THC CONTROUING AUTHORKY ANNOUNCEN IN BRICKLANA V.
WASHINCTON SANAEN OK DOTH PRONGS DECENICICY ANN PREJUNICE WHICH THE PETMONE PROVEN
THEREIN IN WHS POSL CONVICTION MONON/S) AN_HS DDSH HABUAS CORPUS MOTION ROL REUEK.

5. WHETHED THE PETMONC RAHSKA QUCSION T UNAERMINC THE CORDUTNESS DR THE OUTCOME OE
THE TUIAL_WHICH NENIE_HM AUE PROCKSS OK LAW.

6. WHETHED THE COUDAS DEDEINEA PEMMONCR OE HS NC PROCKSS RICHT TO BE HEARD AS TO THE CROUNDS.
RAISKD WMHIN HIS VD5H HABUAS CORRUS MOTION COD REUCK.

HESCO A NO
LA BY OVELDOINTH AN S AOWING THE PMONE TANENADG 254
PETIION.

6
DO TO WARBANT SSUAN OK ACTC O ARABY ONAPAL THE UNTE
COUDLOK APDUALS IN WHICH HE MADE THE REQUISKTE_ SHOWING THEREIN HS MOTON TO REONSINER.

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires the government to pay just compensation when it physically appropriates private property for public use, even if the property is not being used for that public use at the time of the appropriation