1. WHETHER IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR THE RESPONDENT JUDGES, PRO-TEM JUDGE ANTHONY MACKEY, AND MS. TAHELLE MEHEURH, ARIZONA, TO ALLOW PETITIONER TO USURP COURT APPELLATE ISSUES; PERSONAL DECISIONS OVER THAT ARE IN THE PETITIONER'S CASE-PREROGATIVE, WHERE OF DIRECT APPEAL (U.S.C.A. SIXTH AMENDMENT)

2. WHETHER IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR THE RESPONDENT JUDGES, PRO-TEM JUDGE ANTHONY MACKEY, FOR FAILURE UPON TO KNOWINGLY FAIL TO EXERCISE DISCRETION, THEY COULD HAVE A DUTY TO EXERCISE, OR PERFORM RECKIO BY LAW THEY TO PROCEED KIND OF IN CESS OF TIFISHI OF LEN AUDIT IN IS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS OR AN ABUSE OF DISCREET CONSTITUTIONL, KTHE 4 SUFFICIENT TO GRANT K DIRECT APPEAL, WITH REGARDS TO QUESTION NUMBER ONE, U.S.C.A. SIXTH AMENDMENT; U.S.C.A. FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT.

Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who has been diagnosed with a severe mental illness that substantially impairs his rational understanding of the reasons for his execution