1. What, in this case, are the appropriate inquiry for determining when an in forma pauperis litigant's factual allegations justify a § 1915(d) dismissal for frivolousness.

2. What is the proper standard of appellate review of such a dismissal?

3. Whether any of the district court's procedural and evidentiary rulings constituted an abuse of discretion requiring reversal of the judgment.

4. Whether the district court has denied the plaintiff-appellant's right to counsel as an in forma pauperis litigant.

5. What standard governs the district court's discretion to grant or deny reconsideration and amendment in the case at bar?

Question not identified