No. 20-5700
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-regulations civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-interpretation judicial-review sentencing statutory-construction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why did a defendant's due process and equal protection rights be violated by the lower court's failure to address a defendant's sentencing error that was apparent on the face of the record, especially when such error resulted in a drastically longer sentence than what should have been required absent such error?
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Antonio Moss
Antonio Moss — Petitioner
Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent