(1). Is the Florida Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction where Petitioner is bringing Actual Innocence claim, Newly Discovered Evidence that perjured itself by stating to the alibi witness God located?(And lower tribunal denied)?

(2). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction where the lower tribunal barred from the court to Effectuate Intent of Plea agreement?

(3). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction, where the Florida State Supreme Court has developed new case law in the form of Courts New Opinion in which apply to State Petitioner sentence, same as Florida Supreme Courts New Opinion?

(4). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction where the lower Tribunal was perpetrating Judicial Vindictiveness/Fraud where after New trial where Petitioner was convicted of lesser charge but of a more severe sentence taking Petitioners opportunity for written parole even though the sentence not natural life, but it is?

(5). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction where the lower tribunal denied favorable to Petitioners from. Petitioner, not limited to stopping him testifying to the judge, that the ten year old murder victim authorities arrest boy Lawrence killed 91 under to help in murder Charge who was in Kidnaping hours before Roy stated that Roy killed Clara; Roy knew me A State Grandjury indictment based on a denied even Witness identify. Petitioner and both State witness wrongly attorney a the court the man the State reinacted testimony 2.0 de this out when the district attorney ceased State witnesser using State witness a testimony; Also secretary to roleplay all credence after Petitioner trial before destroying it tested? Not limited to prints, cigarette butt of murder perpetrator.

(6). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction, where the attorney to allow the case, in a New trial on deposition any witnesses.

(7). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction, where the lower tribunal in a refused funding experts in forensics for the State where allow forensic experts was use State witness?

(8). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction where the lower tribunal allowed State investigator to twist words of Petitioner through sleep deprivation; forced from him Investigator after he refused Petitioner in a cell even refused to place him stated he to sign assay night to remain silent and speak with them? Even after his refusal did not want to and hours of sleep deprivation they would place Petitioner deprived of phone and away depr an?

(9). Is the Florida State Supreme Court correct in saying it lacks jurisdiction, where the lower tribunal knew that Petitioners attorney at New trial was an ex-police department with the State witness and were friends. Petitioner had lived in Santa Rosa County a short time and was. Shouldn't the attorney and the State have made Petitioner aware of this major conflict of interest? The attorney for Petitioner was friends with State witness what was his working with them was Glen Arnold.

Whether the Florida state courts erred in rejecting the petitioner's claims of due-process, civil-rights, standing, civil-procedure, takings, 35-usc-101