1. Whether the judges ruling that the jury's failure
to reach a unanimus decision was not a failure on the jury's
part, (" That's actually a strong message to the prosecution
that they are unable to meet the burden of proof to the
extent that they can bring back a unanimus verdict."); was
acquittal and the constitutional prohibition of double
jeopardy bars retrial.

2. Whether the judges decision to declare a mistrial
hung jury after only two (2) hours and fifty (50) minutes
of deliberation, an hour of that time consumed by questions
from the jury and a break, without polling the jury dictated
by a "manifest necessity" or"ends of justice," and violated
petitioner Fifth Amendment Rights to have his trial completed
by a particular tribunal.

3. Whether trial court in Petitioner's second
trial lack jurisdiction to impose sentence.

Whether the judges ruling that the jury's failure to reach a unanimous decision was not a failure on the jury's part was acquittal and the constitutional prohibition of double jeopardy bars retrial