(1)
Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fifth, sixth, eight, and fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, By the trial court's exclusion of the bases for expert opinion regarding appellant Mental State was it prejudicial and deprived appellant of his right to due process and a meaning opportunity to present a defense and violated Evidence Code 801 & 802, does this wrongful court's exclusion of the bases of the expert opinion prejudice petitioner given the distorting effect of the rulling?

(2)
Was petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, By The trial court Committed reversible error in denying the defense its request for the two Jury instruction (By) Involuntary Intoxication-CALCRIM 3425 & 3427 and the Unconsciousness defense Cal P.C 26-4, and deprived appellant of his right to due process and a meaning opportunity to present his defense; does the trial court wrongfuly denied the Unconsciousness defense "Legally Unconsciousness" did prejudice petitioner and appellant Ranteesi given the Distorting effect of the Rulling?

(3)
Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fourth, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, By the Fraud committed by the Paxil Manufacturer Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) did caused Vacaville police Failure to read the Miranda Right, Because the Vacaville Police were incompetent to determined that Ranteesi was Intoxicated from Paxil drugs, and Ranteesi was the victim of Medical Malpractice because of Paxil and the Appeallant Ranteesi to Petitioner And the Appeallant Ranteesi were incompetent to determined that Ranteesi was intoxicated from Paxil Does this Vacaville Police incompetent to determined that Ranteesi was intoxicated from Paxil prejudice Petitioner Given the distorting effect of the rulling?

(4)
Was petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, Fourt, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amdndment to the United States Constitution, by the Paxil Manufacturer (Glaxo Smith Kline) (GSK) did caused By the Fraud Committed by the Paxil Manufacturer (Glaxo Smith Kline) (GSK) did caused Vacaville Police and Solano County Prosecution team to becam incompetent to prosecute Ranteesi instead they should prosecute the Negligent Party who get "Ranteesi" Intoxicated without his Fault. Also they intentionally or negligently withheld evidence favorable to Ranteesi, does this Incompetent on Vacaville Police Investigator and Solano County Prosecution team did prejudice Petitioner and appellant Ranteesi given the distorting effect of the Rulling?

(5)
Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fourth, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, By the fact of this case is that the fraud committed by the Paxil Manufacturer Glaxo Smith kline (GSK) did caused the experts witnesses at Ranteesi's jury trial to became deceit

Question not identified