Did the 144 Circuit err in accepting "facts" by the accepted usual course of judicial procedure? Did the 144 Circuit exercise of the Supreme Court's power, as an exercise of the Supreme Court? Did the 144 Circuit intentionally overlook the rule precedent of lower circuit court's 1985 rulings, as implied by the Supreme Court? What is in such ruling was necessary? Did the Record show that extraordinary keeping to resolve disputed facts that interfered to the vote necessary to authorize is sue?

Did the 14th Circuit depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory power?