No. 20-5657
Eric Bernard Scott v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-review mandamus procedural-error standing
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHEN THE UNITED STATES COURT DF APPEALS
ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO RULE
ON
APPELLANH'S
APPEAL WHICH WAS REMANIDED
LUNOD SIHL 1A
2. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT DF APPEALS
ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENVING
THE
MANIDAMUS PETITION AS FRIVDLOUS.
.WHETHER THE UNITED SIATES COURT OF APPEALS
HH NIIH KO LIUUSIT SIIOL
2
WHETHENL THE
UNITED STATES COUKST OFAPPEALS
BOOH SNZANETE NOELEUSITSI SSEE
NT
EAVETD PRDCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals abused its discretion
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Eric Bernard Scott
Eric B. Scott — Petitioner