No. 20-5633
Darren M. Rowe v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence daubert-standard district-court due-process evidence-analysis expert-testimony habeas-corpus judicial-discretion legal-error new-evidence schlup-v-delo standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court committed error when it determined that newly presented evidence does not create for consideration under the Acosta factors as set forth in Solis v. Dell, 559 U.S. 307 (2010)?
Whether the district court committed error when it ruled that when II dwarf under the frivolous and meritless findings based on an improper ex parte consideration of error?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court committed legal error when it determined that the newly presented evidence does not qualify for consideration under the actual innocence gateway standard articulated in Schlup v. Delo
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Darren M. Rowe
Darren M. Rowe — Petitioner