Larry E. Starks, Jr. v. United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois
HabeasCorpus
A. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY
TERMINATING THE INQUIRY AS TO WHETHER THE PETITIONER MET THE REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE THE WRIT
ISSUED ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS COMMITTED AN EGREGIOUS...JUD-ICIALUUSURP 1ATION.jOF i'BOWER. WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT
RECORD CLEARLY REFLECTS THAT THE PETITIONER WAS UNLAWFULLY SENTENCED TO THE. CAREER OFFENDER
ENHANCEMENT BY AN ACT OF THE SENTENCING COMMISSION, NOT BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS, WHICH SEVERELY
VIOLATED THE PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT'S UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THE TENTH
AMENDMENT.
Whether the court of appeals erred in terminating the inquiry into whether the petitioner met the requirements for a writ of certiorari