No. 20-561
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Appellants v. City of San Jose, California, et al.
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2021-01-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-12-28
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting).
2020-12-07
Reply of appellants Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees State of California, et al. (Distributed)
2020-11-25
Motion to affirm filed by appellees City of San Jose, California, et al.
2020-11-24
Motion For Expedited consideration of the Jurisdictional Statement and Waiver of The 14-day Waiting period for Distribution filed by appellant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
2020-11-09
Letter of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. submitted.
2020-10-29
Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
City of San Jose, California, et al.
Richard P. Bress — Latham & Watkins LLP, Respondent
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Petitioner
State of California
Aimee Athena Feinberg — California Department of Justice, Respondent