No. 20-5581 — Supreme Court Petition Tracker

No. 20-5581

Lower Court: Federal Circuit

Docketed: 2020-09-03

Status: Dismissed

Type: IFP

Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP

Tags: case-dismissal civil-rights court-of-federal-claims due-process filing-fee indigent indigent-plaintiff procedural-due-process standing title-vii

Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration

Latest Conference: 2020-12-04 (distributed 2 times)

Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel an indigent Title VII
Plaintiff to pay a filing fee at the time when the Plaintiff doesn 't
have money at all, and the Plaintiff is financially ineligible to pay a
filing fee?

2) Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel the indigent Plaintiff
to pay a filing fee "within 10 days " without identifying from what
date the calculation of the time starts - from the date when the
Court issues an Order or from the date when the Plaintiff received
this Order in mail?

3) Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims dismiss Plaintiff 's
Complaint on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to pay a filing fee
within 10 days from the issuance of the Order if the Plaintiff
filed a statement within seven days from the receiving of the
Order in mail explaining that the Plaintiff didn 't have money to
pay a filing fee at that moment, and the Plaintiff asked the Court to
wait until I receive my salary?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel an indigent Title VII plaintiff to pay a filing fee when the plaintiff doesn't have money and is financially ineligible to pay the fee?

Docket Entries

2020-12-07

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.

2020-11-10

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.

2020-10-24

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.

Main Document Proof of Service

2020-10-13

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

2020-09-24

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.

2020-09-17

Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.

Main Document

2020-08-19

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2020)

Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service