Can the systematic deprivation of counsel be used as the primary reason to deny access-to-the-courts of Florida?

2. Is a two (2) year period reasonable for a court not to rule on issues pertaining to fraud responsible for Petitioner's false imprisonment?

3. Can the deprivation of a clear and indisputable constitutional right be facilitated through a state court's failure to rule?

4. (a) Can material facts be subjugated through a state court's failure to correct a judicial usurpation of power or a clear abuse of discretion?

4. (b) Can a lawyer in documented violations of Rule 8 of this Court lawfully file a writ with this Court, who is also named as a principal defendant in the underlying instant civil action for injunction?

Can the systematic deprivation of counsel be used as the primary reason to deny post-conviction relief?