1) Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred on a matter of public importance and created a circuit split when it ruled that subject matter jurisdiction for a revocation under § 3583 is not dependent on subject matter jurisdiction for the underlying criminal offense?

2) Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred on a matter of public importance when it reasoned that revocation under 18 USC 3583 (e)(3) does not implicate the Sixth Amendment's right to a jury trial?

Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred on a matter of public importance and created a circuit split when it ruled that subject matter jurisdiction for a revocation under § 3583 is not dependent on subject matter jurisdiction for the underlying criminal offense?