WHETHER THE DEFINITION OF "DEBT COLLECTOR" UNDER THE FDCPA INCLUDES ATTORNEYS WHO SELECT NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE AS THERE IS A SHARP SPLIT IN CIRCUITS FOR DEBTORS AGGRIEVED BY CONGRESS IN 1997

WHETHER THE COURT WILL RESOLVE THE CONTINUED UNCERTAINTY OF THE MANIFEST DISREGARD DOCTRINE, CASE 19-1792 PRESENTED A SORT OF GRAVE CONTINGENCY THAT WOULD JUSTIFY RECALL OF A MANDATE

WHETHER NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE IS PROPERLY CHARACTERIZED AS DEBT COLLECTION

WHETHER A MORTGAGEE IF CRIME BECAUSE LI IS A HOUSE AND NOT ATTORNEY AT STAKE AND WHETHER TRYING TO FORECLOSE COUNTS AS COLLECTING A DEBT OVER WHEN A BANK'S MISTAKES AND LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE CAUSES PEOPLE TO FACE UNLAWFUL FORECLOSURE

Whether the definition of a 'debt collector' under the FDCPA includes attorneys who select non-judicial foreclosure