No. 20-5529
Herman Bernard v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: aedpa amendment bankruptcy-court district-court due-process habeas-corpus judgment jurisdictional-defect procedural-rules successive-motions successive-petition
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in denying a motion to amend a petition under the AEDPA, as the Eleventh Circuit has required that a motion to amend a petition is equally a successive petition under the AEDPA, and whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in concluding that the lack of a judgment evidenced meant the District Court should have stayed the proceedings
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Herman Bernard
Herman Bernard — Petitioner