No. 20-5519
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: arrest arrest-initiation conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process prosecution prosecutorial-delay public-defender speedy-trial
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
APPELLATE DISTRICT COURTS IN ILLINOIS ARE SPLIT ON HOW AN ARREST INITIATES PROSECUTION OR WHETHER IT DOES AT ALL. ARE THERE CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE A PERSON'S ARREST AND ACCUSATION FOR AN OFFENSE, with delays, can initiate his prosecution for purposes of his constitutional right to a speedy TRIAL?
IN ILLINOIS, INDIGENT DEFENDANTS WHO ARE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC DEFENDERS' OFFICES ARE UNDER A DIFFERENT STANDARD REGARDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AS THOSE REPRESENTED BY A PRIVATE LAW FIRM. ARE THERE ANY CONCEIVABLE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT Could create an office-wide conflict of interest IN A PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE. ILLINOIS SAYS NO.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When does an arrest initiate prosecution for speedy trial purposes?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2020-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Richard Wanke
Richard E. Wanke — Petitioner