No. 20-5514

Daryl D. Nelson v. Mike Brown, Acting Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-10-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Circuit Court commit a reversible error and grossly violate petitioner's Due Process when it (1) overlooked the district court's fact-finding and its determination that the assistant prosecutor did commit a fraud on the court by signing the various documents initiating the prosecution against petitioner (2) overlooking the district court's reasoning contrary to the law/authority it cited, that it was without authority to GRANT petitioner relief from judgment because the fraud was not committed by a federal officer?

Did the Circuit court commit a reversible error and grossly violate petitioner's Due Process when it overlooked the record and evidence that petitioner presented to support his request to disqualify the district court's judge for ignoring the Michigan Court of Appeals ex post facto Law used to affirm his conviction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause

Docket Entries

2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Mike Brown, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2020-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Daryl D. Nelson
Daryl Dude Nelson — Petitioner
Mike Brown, Acting Warden
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent