[1] HOW? COULD JUDGE ELIZABETH G, RICE OF THE 13th JUDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION,FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE WRITTEN LAW, THE PETITIONERS RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL AS GUARANTEED BY ARTICLE 1, SECTION 22, OF THE FLORIDA CONSITITUTION;

[2] HOW ? COULD PETITIONERS SEVENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BE DENIED WHEN IT ENSURES THE PETITIONERS RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN CIVIL CASES INVOLVING CLAIMS VALUED MORE THAN 20 DOLLARS.AND PETITIONER NOR DEFENDANTS EXPRESSLY WAVIED THERE RIGHTS TO A TRIAL BY JURY AND THE RATIFICATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO DUE PROCESSRECEIVED

[3] HOW?COULD JUDGE ELIZABETH G RICE HAVE FAILED TO BE FAITHFUL TO THE RULE I MAINTAIN PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN IT, AND PERFORM JUDICIAL DUTIES WITHOUT BIAS, OR PREJUDICE

[4]HOW? COULD THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JUST SIMPLY STATE [BY ORDER OF THE COURT APPELLANTS MOTION FOR REHEARING IS DENIED] THIS IS AN UNELABORATED DECISION.

[5] HOW? COULD THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DENY THE PETITIONERS MOTION FOR DISCOVERY OF AN UNELABORATED DECISION OF A CASE RULING

[6]HOW? IS IT THAT ONE OF THE DECISIONS ON REVIEW IS A DECISION OF A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT EXPRESSLY CONSTRUES PROVISIONS OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS AND DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH DECISIONS OF OTHER DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL ON THE SAME QUESTIONS OF LAW, AND THIS CASE HAS NOT BEEN RETURN TO THE ACTIVE DOCKET, REQUESTING THE COURT TO PROCEED IN SETTING A DATE FOR AN INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FOR TRIAL

MAINTAIN PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN IT, AND PERFORM JUDICIAL DUTIES WITHOUT BIAS, OR PREJUDICE