1. Is it a violation for an Arbitrator to assert a defense on behalf of a defendant of which the defendant did not request or present on their own behalf?

2. Once identified as false evidence "prior " to ruling, does a ruling officer of the court violate due process or commit judicial misconduct by ruling on an issue utilizing that false evidence that was non-existent?

3. Whether an officer of the court violates a contractual agreement when they switch from agreed upon terms between all parties to a term that creates a detriment to one party?

Is an arbitrator's assertion of a defense on behalf of a defendant a violation?