No. 20-5497
Marcus Simpson v. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-usurpation mandamus perjury wrongful-conviction
Latest Conference:
2020-12-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether perjury has amounted to and causes one or both. The judicial usurpation of power or abuse of discretion by the trial court, therefore mandamus (Lie's).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether perjury has amounted to and causes one or both the judicial usurpation of power or abuse of discretion by the trial court, therefore mandamus (Lie's)
Docket Entries
2020-12-14
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-11-24
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-11-09
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-10-19
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondents Hamilton County Common Pleas Court, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Hamilton County Common Pleas Court, et al.
Scott Matthew Heenan — Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Marcus Simpson
Marcus Simpson — Petitioner