No. 20-5474
Montez L. Clayton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
vWA Vo ^r\0 wcVW, yW -a^i c,r\^) A VvvsAors
Vo fV\soAl
V'L ViW| '
vs V^a-'^Y V\^ v *v*r Wen
Ve%\wv<^ U^-W^
Wtve^C V V wAVa.T W 3oV- vAW^*£$*** **>•**" «-<«*
) \JH AsaMlWtr»W«V HooffMjj m-. t*®**"** 1".\v*_ tf\Su'AicAiW25 *?3
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's sentence was unconstitutionally excessive
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Montez L. Clayton
Montez L. Clayton — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent