No. 20-5472
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-authority criminal-procedure due-process federal-law jurisdictional-challenge restitution sentencing state-law statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
The State of Missouri has a Statute that criminalizes the transfer of dee. Custody or @acontcol of ANY Corin +o aNatrer, or ko another place, when the statute is Votated bu Law antoceanreat Prior to Saicial wvelvement. The Eagnthy Circart hos Aeocred O Uelahon of Mo. bev. Stat, 4.170, & unconahtohona.| Procedure...
(abhor aASke This Court » vonetngr She district court had Lacal and constituhonal avinordy to inven peistremon, iA Lignt of The Clouse in 18 USC. 323t, and Mo. Aa, Stat 544,110 :
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court had legal and constitutional authority to impose restitution, in light of the clause in 18 U.S.C. 3231, and Mo. Rev. Stat. 544.170
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Henry Dailey
Henry Dailey — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent