Quastin of greatpabli mportance: Das Sction 22A
.'
of the A E D P A of lgb) stating that" The Antiterrorism and Effaitive Death
Penalty Act requires a state puisoser secking a federal habeas Lorpus
remedy to file his federal petitin wsith
this Oe -year of conclusion
at
dirent review or the expination of
the tine for Seckirig such roview?
U.S.C.S. 3 2244(D)(0)A).
onclusion of his praperly Liled apphicatios tor state post -Convictin
The statote dase State that: Howseveg Underthe AEDAA,
the tine during which a popercly
filedapphiation for State post-Conviction
is Subsertion. 28. USCS& 2244C @a). S0 Exhibt B-C.
Do p
Detioner Caluin should have beergranted his consttutinal right to allow his
Federal Habeas Lorpus to travel as timely after the conclusis of his state Lourt
post- Convictin motion 3.80olas, 0n Apca), 2014, As wel is LaluivLasnon
15 S0. 3d 10y/(FLa20i4) AState Habeasorpus petitian, decided on Dec8ta 2014
Gee Exh B-C. Thus, Within Case No:5:15-CN-O0030-wTH-PRL.

Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) requires a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief to file his federal petition within one year of the conclusion of his state court post-conviction proceedings, or whether the one-year limitations period is tolled during the pendency of a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review