No. 20-5429
Derrick T. Neville, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
approacl does not apply to the texn "serious drvg
sffense pursuant to 92yle)(2lA)i). Tne tevm "requires an ly
that the state offsuse inuolue theconduct specified in the
federal statute."Notwithstandiny the forementioned, Can a
Sentenciny Court Consistent with the 3ixth Hmendment, and
this coucts holdings in Apprendi and Allyene "use a fuct,
−
other then the foct of a prior convictin to subject a
defeudunt to enbussced Stututory Mininmas and mukinous.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court can consistently apply the Sixth Amendment and the Court's holdings in Apprendi and Alleyne to require a jury to find facts that increase a criminal sentence beyond the statutory maximum or mandatory minimum
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Derrick Neville
Derrick Neville — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent