AState Court of last resort decided an- important question of law
in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this court.
This court decided Lafler V Cooper, in March of 2012, following the
filing of my initial habeas application. An application for writ of
Habeas Corpus was filed challenging this error that occurred in
this case but was dismissed, because it was not presented in the
initial application, recently in Chaidez \I United States, was
decided by this court inwhich it was stated that this tafler V.
Coopery did apply retroactive because it was simply a garden-varity
of Strickland \l Washington, which now brings the following question;
Whether or not the Court of sCriminal^Appeals^decisions was .contrary
to a decision by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, also by
this court court court on the review of a rule the did not exist
Also was the court's at the time of an initial application ?
decision contrary to clearly extablished law.

Whether the state court's decision was contrary to this Court's decision in Lafler v. Cooper and Chaidez v. United States, and whether the court's decision was contrary to clearly established federal law