1 USCA(case 20-7001) erroneously denied my motion for court appointed counsel, aledging case did not have merits despite chief judge Me Mahon NYSD(18-01740)judged it had merits and transferred it to DC because of venue.

2 USCA(3d par.april 15 2020 judgment, erroneously holds " Appellant 's complaint failed to set forth "a short and plain statement " of the claims showing she is entitled to relief Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) ", indeed,I did enclose in original complaint the statement required(as stated on p.7 of brief) "4. Likewise,on pp.14 to.20 of my pro se complaint, I stated " V. SHORT AND PLAIN STA TEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS ", Indeed,on pp. 14 to 20,parr.l3 on,of my civil action in district court 19-3349,1 had enclosed a "short and plain statement of claims ''(see Appendix C,p.l4 of original complaint)

3 USCA did not grant my request to file an amended complaint thus contradicting itself since I was reproached by USCA in last year same case 18-7182 appeal "57ie didn 't ask nor was granted ,district judge for leave to file an amended complaint court stated the judge had erred in so doing (to cure electronically actual district court case formal defects would be faster,save trees and cost me(I am in forma pauperis) another $200 in international mailing of a new original complaint if I am dismissed; thus USCA should have asked district judge CHUTKAN to let me amend my supposedly formally defective complaint,before dismissing it.

Whether the court erroneously denied the motion for court-appointed counsel and erroneously held that the complaint failed to set forth a short and plain statement of the claims