No. 20-5415

Gillman Roddy Long, aka Dave Gillman Long v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment appeal-review civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence fifth-amendment habeas-corpus self-incrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does an objection to the governments arguement that a defendant."had not denied the accusations against him." violate the fifth Amendment?

2. Does the Lower Court error, whn it dismissed petitioner's C.O.A. of a true 6D(b)(4), VoidJudgemart that; A). Raised a defect in the integrity of the habeas Proceedings, and B). Seeked the Court of appeals to examine whether the district Court Committed esror when it adjudicated Petitioner's fifth-Amendment Claim by improperly applying Suxth amendmort Criteria?

3. Does an objection at trial preserve a Claim of ersor for appeal review?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an objection to the government's argument that a defendant 'had not denied the accusations against him' violate the Fifth Amendment?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Gillman Long
Gillman Roddy Long — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent