Did the Arizona Supreme Court err by denying Petition For Review and Request For A Stay of Proceedings in disregard of the fact that ongoing parallel civil proceedings could substantially prejudice Josiah English I's right in his pending criminal trial case pursuant to Federal case law, and even their own Arizona case law?

Did Hon. Judge Alison S. Bachus act arbitrarily and capriciously by denying Father - Josiah English II's Motion for Stay of Termination of Parent-Child Relationship and Dependency Trial (filed Pro Se by Father on January 2nd 2018) in her Minute Entry filed in the two Juvenile Cases on February 7th 2018 (please see Appendix E attached), and by depriving him of a hearing of law, protected under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, of his fundamental liberty interest in having a relationship, association, companionship, and communication with his two biological children, and his right to Due Process of Law and The Equal Protection of The Laws, protected under the 14th Amendment to The U.S. Constitution?

Did Hon. Judge Jo Lyn Gentry act arbitrarily and capriciously by denying Respondent (please see Appendix E attached) and by depriving him of a hearing in that matter in violation of Father's right to remain silent until he chooses to testify at a Jury Trial in a criminal case pursuant to The U.S. Constitution and in violation of Father's fundamental liberty interest in having a relationship, association, companionship, and communication with his two biological children, and his right to Due Process of Law and The Equal Protection of The Laws, protected under the 14th Amendment to The U.S. Constitution?

Is Hon. Judge Jo Lynn Gentry acting arbitrarily and capriciously abusing her discretion, and acting in absence or excess of jurisdiction, by proceeding with the combined dependency and severance trial of the children M.E. and V.E. before the children M.E. and V.E. have ever been deemed as dependent (after Arizona DCS's initial Dependency Petition was filed on February 3rd 2017 and failing to complete the dependency adjudication hearing in violation of the 90(ninety day deadline set under AZ's 8-821-a (1) and by keeping the children M.E. and V.E. since 4-26-2018 outside of The United States in Mexico with their maternal aunt) in violation of Father's fundamental liberty interest in having a relationship, association, and communication with his two biological children, and his right to Due Process of Law and The Equal Protection of the Laws, protected under the 14th Amendment to The U.S. Constitution?

Did the Arizona Supreme court err by denying Father Fesigh English TIL's Petition for Review and request for a stay of proceedings, despite the fact that parallel civil (federal district court) proceedings could substantially prejudice English TIL's rights in his still pending capital criminal case, pursuant to federal case law and the Arizona's own case law?