No. 20-5399

Anthony Leon Latimer, aka Gerrald Smith v. Ben Jones, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 911-caller civil-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process emergency-provision false-imprisonment good-samaritan good-samaritan-law law-enforcement-immunity
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

M>id tbcpefcthfler can pri 7na Mental State* of mbnre 'A?

During the TAA/ESTI&ATIO/V PHASE 5 did d&fertdart-ffsgt. Bet1 Jones) Violate the petitioners sood
Samaritan immunity by arrestfngjand cha^inythe petitioner With criminal Offenses s-6ot,snd
s-few?

3. During the^ Xnv'bstt &Atioa/ PHASE,,dfd deferdantfet. gen Jones) corner-#-'perjury to secure the,
warrant, and arrest the petitioner for caning 9H by Stating he ''avers retrieved*?.
Control purchases From the residence?

H.During +h& 3uDxtiAL Phase,didGotti iarnaritan XMMOJstrrY-^aKwss OPANWD 3+ +r>© Motions Hearing fcy 6-. teasute,
by snowing petitioner to be SubSegue*rtHy prosecuted?

5. During *n© xnv/estx &ATJ oa/ PHASE, did defendant (ASA. Michele HdrtSerb violate the petitioners
Bood Samaritan immunity by charging, and prosecuting Petition torthe Prohibit Offenses
3-boi,and S'b\°l?

b. If the decedent (k.&.C) was found in possession of Narcotic^ in her bra, ports(toctef 7
and her Louis i/uttor) putrse-(own effects) , touid the Stood samatitan b& charged for
any drug possession Offenses, being looted Out the apartment by the oeadbottP

7# Idas the legislature : intent bjj passing theQoodSamaritan L3W(cP-i •Z\0),Uasfor the
911 caller to be protected from False IMPRISONMENT fbrin*6ood faith ^ seeding EMer&ehcY
pp&iiSLON to try +o Save a Life ? Or fhe legislator XNTEAfr passing the &ocd Sam-
arifan L3W was for the 9H mailer t-o st-iii be* subject- to arrest, charge,, and prosecution
for in "Good faith" seeding EMERGENCY PROVISION to fry to save a Life ?

8. can the defendant's be a Hooted to maintain thegiMMuNirY^fi-ven when they chose*to
violate the immunity of the <?n c^iieriPetMonert by arresting,charging*)^Seating
prosecution ?

\ Idas the* deferdantsiA.s.A. Mich&lA Hansen ,sgt- 6-®n Jones, Xup&B Danielle DuJt/©r)|n 'DEFAULT'
by refusing to answerto the petitioner's complaint within "bo'days''that u)as'QPb&Rei>"
by (AG. District court JUD&e fi^uiaXinus on tojiijlB, and defadamsdidht answer inti/I
after petitioners Motion FoP default Judgement on

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the petitioner call 911 in a mental state of emergency?

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-11
Waiver of right of respondents Judge Daniel Dwyer and Michele Hansen to respond filed.
2020-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Anthony Latimer
Anthony Leon Latimer — Petitioner
Judge Daniel Dwyer and Michele Hansen
Michele Joan McDonald — Respondent