No. 20-5382

William Charles Graham v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitution constitutional-rights due-process federal-system government-discretion judicial-independence legal-safeguards standing
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is the Constitution of the Unifed States of Amenico, its Arhickes, and its Amendments the Supreme law of the land ?

2. Is slavery abolished in its legal form ?

3. Is fighting for what is mine, a crime ?

4. Do my Constifutional Rights derive from a human being discretion?

5. Process without any direct consequences?

6. Ds the Federal sstem have proven independenc b. Amenica?

8. Ho does an Asst Uited States Aorey whoination Aice e., l. Tite o Noity 1 who represents the Government utter an Unlanful circumvented defective indictment and not face any direct consequences?

Is FRAUD due process 7

7. Accori Coitti n Amrin s (e egd Me o" Being the indictment of the federal syster is equivalent to the States version of the Fourth $ Amendment Warrant, do signatures of the FoReperson and V.s. Attorney name need to be visible an signed under penalty of perjury for such document to have validity?

Can chief deputy clerks issue a properly drawn Fourth Amendment Warant underathoraffirmati Stating who and what are to be searched or seized ?

Can n n Wa Wt oru N o LAWFUL ?

As an tiice o the highest ot inervene his mr and cease he oppression and Malc .

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Constitution of the United States of America, its Articles, and its Amendments are the Supreme Law of the land?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2020)

Attorneys

United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
William Charles Graham
William Charles Graham — Petitioner