Whether circumstances that constitute exceptions to rule precluding successive postconviction filing include: 1) cases in which the prisoner can show that there has been an intervening decision of the Mississippi or United States Supreme Court which would adversely affect the outcome of his conviction; 2) cases in which the prisoner has new evidence, not discoverable at trial that would have caused a different result in sentence; or 3) cases in which the prisoner claims his sentence has expired had he been sentenced pursuant to Miss.Code Ann.99-39-81;99-39-23(6).

Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in denying post-conviction relief despite the prisoner's claims that his trial counsel was ineffective, that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury, and that the prisoner was deprived of certain constitutional rights