1. WHETHER THE PETITIONER'S PETITION IS TIMELY AND/OR THE ONE YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN PETITIONER'S CASE ARE EQUATABLY TOLLED UNDER HOLLAND V. FLORIDA, 560 U.S. 631 (2010)?

II. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AND UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING PETITION WITHOUT ADDRESSING ANY ISSUE(S) AND/OR OPINION AND THRIR DENIAL DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO, AND/OR AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF, CLEARLY ESTABLISHED SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT AND WAS NOT BASED ON A REASONABLE DETERMINATION OF THE FACTS IN LIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)?

whether-the-petitioner's-petition-is-timely-and/or-the-one-year-statute-of-limitations-in-petitioner's-case-are-equatably-tolled-under-holland-v.-florida-560-u.s.-631-(2010)