\a\AW Vb VV e- AA A (X^A 'A'oV^
qxxA \b\W\xA \\A XU^AA VjO\W
^XyoXXAjVvJL ASX V Cj^AX qmA 'X'X ev\Xau^%
V> <x YW^-w
VxA ~ W\A \W xAA l-A Qv x\^-^'O'A
<>A AnOoA <0- v^Au(Xrv\ s&xAe.
X\\A «XN\Ve.f\ N^-N
v uvvx'A ^ V ^
, a y.PXCXA ^ x^ovA V &a s*W\ %JJL~A)<X QxA&JlA
\A~\V
X 'x V^X ^Oj\'
X) fs^|<bn\tn\ A\\
&Wn CX.\J yY\ ^r\ X Ov\\fY\\YAN^
C^vjA S»V\W X\nw\\S%A X\c\\A\A
3)U ,u w\Ak\» UY Y ^ e^WW V«xrt^
Y\ ^ ^ YY Q
y\oV cwrAcXX^ A Xv^ \yn^oXA^ °X\ X Xo«W WvxWW Au<5yx C-^cxAmc
>\\ Wv\\)Y ^"WN^X^S (\\f\X \V\£. V^oWiV^^VO ^V^VexX^CiU-e
exA
\A\ W AooXa^M.\_cxcW N
vAvoCj^xo'SL:
\X5. 3vWX? vWw A ovf\ Xv\v^\cXy

• A. s>\^V\ ^ Lc»nWv>^_ \
sAVoA*^ V A xV W bV^W
^yCNisW OvV3^r\^V\es ^<l_ \AC\v\
\W.

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to exhaust administrative remedies