THE TRIAL COURT DENIED PETITIONER DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW RIGHTS WHEN THE TRIAL COURT HAVING FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT PETITIONER PLED GUILTY AS A RESULT OF A PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENT WHICH AS PART OF THE PLEA THERE WOULD BE NO MANDATORY MINIMUM IN SENTENCING PETITIONER AS PETITIONER'S SENTENCE WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED FROM SENTENCING GUIDELINES WHEN THE TRIAL COURT ELECTED TO DISREGARD THE PLEA AGREEMENT AND SENTENCED PETITIONER TO A MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE THE TERM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) YEARS INCARCERATION, IN BREACH OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT.

THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO OBJECT TO THE PLEA AGREEMENT DURING THE SENTENCING OF PETITIONER WHICH DENIED PETITIONER THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.

APPELLATE COUNSEL FAILED TO RAISE THE ABOVE TWO (2) ISSUES ON APPEAL, THEREBY DENYING THE PETITIONER THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL.

Did the trial court deny the petitioner due process and equal protection rights by disregarding the plea agreement and imposing a mandatory minimum sentence?