1. Does an anonymous tip providing minimal physical and location descriptors and
alleging ongoing domestic violence that is not corroborated when police respond
within minutes of the call suffice to support a stop and frisk based on
"circumstances common to domestic violence calls"?

3. Whether the Third Circuit's approach to determining that New Jersey's second
degree robbery statute is divisible is contrary to Mathis v. United States when it
ignores state law sources and relies on the layout of the statute and the fact
that different subsections require different proof?

Does an anonymous tip providing minimal physical and location descriptors and alleging ongoing domestic violence that is not corroborated when police respond within minutes of the call suffice to support a stop and frisk based on 'circumstances common to domestic violence calls?