Norman Paul Blanco v. Ralph Diaz, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
Arbitration
Aunder parole consideration arficle under I vection 32 of california prparition fonmater whnvilenfe constitution sentence
ner th p atn ith febny attenve Qualiftr der not it r caifia a volen e calitmia peral cade WX5(??
if proposition exluer the iposition of an "enhancment conetiv enee tenative ventence then h i a implimented and applyed this since enhancenent is listed under ialiforia peral ade (067.5(4) C califria fenal are L2OLSfi e.exde
is under penal ude 6o6t.5 violent felany under caliEria Lift?? Prop5 since enharcements, conseevtive excludes ventence or alternatin sces on riar oseer'?
PrD OtVAr califoriapenal ade 24sAl@ ANualt with a fireurm Petitrners pince Gisted under califortia penal ade felony" is rimary offerve prinapal y ( qualify under the entiflement to early parde canvrideration unde arficle I rection proparition 57 32 of the calforia convtitution for innater??
Whether California's sentencing enhancement scheme for certain felony convictions violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment