In a 15 U.S.C. § 1 controversy claiming industry, law, attorney, group boycott, can District and Appellant Courts, one after the next, deny a citizen retained by Congress to investigate at 15 U.S.C. §§ 5, 15 and recover theft U.S.C. §§ 3729, 3730(b)(l)(c)(3) his U.S. Constitution 14th guarantees of administrative and procedural due process, confrontation, hearing and searching examination, privileges and equal protection to protect himself from the opposition 's associates network retaliation?

In same civil controversy can District and Appellant Courts deny 14th amendment guarantee to quash speech? Thereby conceal defendant 's reliance on California anti-SLAPP too libel a federal agent, reversing who is harming whom, to cover up defendant 's concealing enterprise organized crime infiltration detrimental to United States, States of the United States, Citizens of United States and commerce on affirmative antitrust determinations; Federal Trade Commission v Intel Corporation Docket 9341 & EUCC 37.990 v Intel Corp., and on federal and State agent discovery 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2 cognizable § 15 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1371, 1512, 1513, 1516, 1519, 1957, 1962c cognizable § 1964c.

At the appellate level can Ninth Circuit Judges deny confrontation on appeal negating too address an indigent Appellant 's legitimate Motion to proceed in forma pauperis ? And thereby do dismiss said appeal?

Administratively, appellant having revealed to a Ninth Circuit Docket Clerk his intention to pay $505 District Court filing fee [to expedite the appeal] can Judges then expedite too Dismiss said Appeal pursuant 28 USC § 1915 (e)(2) while a) filing fee is transiting in the mail and, b) on judgment Entered the day following District Court Entry of Payment?

Whether District and Appellant Courts can deny a citizen's 14th Amendment guarantees of due process, confrontation, and equal protection in a 15 U.S.C. § 1 antitrust controversy