1.) Should the Government correct error committed when applying 'The Fair
Sentencing Act ' (Nov. 2014)? And if an applicant 's reduction for
Substantial Assistance was removed in error by the Government (who did
not follow Statute JilBl. 10.10 instructions), should the applicant be able to
apply the removed substantial assistance to a potential future conviction
(Sibron v. New York (1968)?

2.) If the assistance of counsel and/or arresting officer are found to have
criminal convictions post the appellant 's plea of guilty, should there be merit
to overturn a previous decision?

3.) How can United States v. Gall (2007) be used as justification for error in
applying 'The Fair Sentencing Act ' (Nov. 2014). When United States v. Gall
is an at sentencing decision and 'The Fair Sentencing Act ' has instructions
to follow under Statute ^IBI.10?

Should the Government correct error committed when applying 'The Fair Sentencing Act'