k. WHETHER CONTRACT LAW IDENTIFIES THAT AN AGREEMENT CAN BE SUED "BAD FAITH" AND MADE VOIDABLE BY EITHER EXTRINSIC FRAUD OR, ANOTHER INADVERTENT OMISSION OF PERTINENT INJURIOUS INFORMATION ABOUT THE AGREEMENT

"DOES ANY COURT HAVE THE REMAINING AUTHORITY TO HEAR SUCH A CASE IF THE PETITIONER HAS PASSED? OR DOES IT FOLLOW PETITIONER'S EXPIRATION DATE TO

B. DOES LIABILITY AND ANY RESCINDING FROM AN AGREEMENT SIGNED UNDER BAD FAITH, AND ITS PROVISIONS, FALL ON A LAWYER THAT INADVERTENTLY OMITTED INJURIOUS INFORMATION OR THE AGREEMENT FROM A CLIENT, INTENTIONALLY OR ACCIDENTALLY? OR DOES IT FALL BY THE PETITIONER'S

C. QUANTUM AND ANY INJURY RESULTING FROM AN AGREEMENT SIGNED UNDER BAD FAITH, AND ITS PROVISIONS, FALL ON A PROSECUTOR THAT INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW FOR CONTRACTUAL DEALINGS, OR DOES IT FALL OUTSIDE THE PETITIONER'S

Where contract law identifies that an agreement can be signed under bad faith and made voidable by either extrinsic fraud or an intentional omission of pertinent/injurious information about the agreement, does any court have the granting authority to hear such a case if the expiration date to file time has passed?