I. WAS PETITIONER'S FIFTH AMENDMENT COMPULSORY SELF INCRIMINATION WAS VIOLATED
BECAUSE THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS GLENN KIRSCHNER AND NIHAR MOHANTY THREATEN
TO PROSECUTE PETITIONER'S BABY'S MOTHER [NASTASHA HENDERSON] FOR OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE,IF PETITIONER DID NOT ADMIT GUILT TO: SECOND DEGREE MURDER WHILE
ARMED AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE?

II.WAS PETITIONER DENIED SIXTH AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY
HIS ATTORNEY PAUL SIGNET FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF
PETITIONER'S PLEA AGREEMENT BEFORE HE PROVIDED PETITIONER MANIFESTLY INCORRECT
INFORMATION AND ADVISED PETITIONER TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY TO SAVE HIS
BABY'S MOTHER?

III. WAS PETITIONER DENIED FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WHEN
HE TRIED TO BRING HIS FACTUAL CONSTITUTION CLAIMS TO THE COURT'S ATTENTION
AND THEY REJECT HIS CLAIMS,EVIDENCE AND CONSIDERED HIS CLAIMS PROCEDURALLY
BARRED?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause