1. Whether The Sixth Circuit Court Of Appeals erred and made a decision that conflicts with this Court's holding in Rothgery v Gillespie . 128 Set 2570 (2008) by concluding that under Michigan law, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to the initial arraignment on the warrant?

2. Whether Mr, Washington's due process rights were violated when the State made use at trial of a pregnant witness's statement extracted by police through egregious torture-type-tactics and psychological coercion? And, Can the reviewing court on habeas review, rely on the existing trial court record as a factual basis to determine the coercion?

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel extends to the initial arraignment on the warrant